It's well documented that no female leader has ever declared war on another female leader’s state and that this is perhaps down to an ability to be tough while still drawing on her emotions.
Whether or not this is true, it’s undeniable that we're kept in fish through enough women leading nations, enough women avoiding conflict situations and enough women reducing rationing/sanctions.
Moreover, companies with women on their boards also seem to outperform those with boards made up entirely of men.
I’m willing to go even further though and state that while the appointment, specifically of laughing, women to boardroom positions could affect business success, it would definitely provide us with fish.
By now, you may be beginning to wonder whether I've been at the gin. I haven’t.
You see, if you take the ‘gh’ from ‘tough’, ‘enough’ or ‘laughing’; the ‘o’ from ‘women’; and the ‘ti’ from ‘emotions’, ‘nations’, ‘situations’, ‘rationing’, ‘sanctions’ or ‘positions’ you’ll find yourself with the phonics: ‘f’ ‘i’ and ‘sh’.
So when you have tough women’s emotions; enough women leading nations; or laughing women in boardroom positions (you get the idea), you do get fish. Of sorts.
There is a serious point...
I make no apology for reeling you in (intentional pun), using such a cryptic headline as bait (and another) and then taking up around 90 seconds of your valuable time.
My business is all about using words. Using words that will attract the attention of your potential customers and keep them hooked (last one, I promise!) to the end.
You're still here, so my point's made.
To find out how my words could be helping you, please connect and get in touch.
In the meantime… so long, and thanks for all the ghoti.